Harbingers’ Magazine is a hands-on school of journalism which teaches all things creative by inviting young adults to run an online literary magazine.
harbinger | noun
har·bin·ger | \ˈhär-bən-jər\
1. one that initiates a major change: a person or thing that originates or helps open up a new activity, method, or technology; pioneer.
2. something that foreshadows a future event : something that gives an anticipatory sign of what is to come.
We and our partners may store and access personal data such as cookies, device identifiers or other similar technologies on your device and process such data to personalise content and ads, provide social media features and analyse our traffic.
November 1, 2021
What ‘is’ dark energy and matter, the 95 percent of the Universe we know nothing about?
Milky Way, photographed from Max Patch, North Carolina, United States
In 1929, when Edwin Hubble proved that the universe is expanding, an important question arose: so what will the Apocalypse look like then?
The first option was that the universe would eventually stop its expansion and recollapse, due to the excessive amount of energy density. The other – that expansion will never stop, therefore the end would be dissolvement into near-nothingness.
Until the 1990s there was a widespread consensus based on Albert Einstein’s theory of gravity, which assumed that gravity is the ultimate force, slowing us down and that it will eventually first prevent motion and subsequently retract the expansion of the universe.
However in 1998, when the Hubble Space Telescope allowed scientists to observe objects far away, studies of distant supernovae proved something completely different: the speed at which the universe expands is currently greater than it was in the past.
This data not only contradicted the theory about gravity slowing down the expansion of the universe, but also presented an additional unknown: a factor which influenced the universe so its expansion rate suddenly increased about 8 billion years ago.
Scientists had no idea how to explain the data, they only know that they missed something of huge importance. This mystery remains largely unsolved, yet physicists attempt at finding the answer.
What would it mean if there was life on Venus?
It only makes sense for some life to exist somewhere out there. A recent research paper has shifted the spotlight to our sister planet, Venus.
by Aleksy Chwedczuk
There are two basic lines of reasoning. The first hypothesis focuses on amending Einstein’s theory of gravity by attempting to incorporate the ‘cosmological constant’ from another of Einstein’s gravity-related theories. This would be explained as an energy of anti-gravitational properties, filling the space and pushing objects from one another, increasing expansion. The other option assumes that there is an error in Einstein’s theory of gravity and involves attempts at providing a new theory thereof, which would explain the enormous acceleration.
Physicists believe that the change of rate in the expansion of the universe is due to a mysterious force which they describe as the ‘dark energy’. The notion of ‘dark energy’, however, is not a description of a physical phenomenon but a designation of a theoretical problem.
Analysis of universe expansion allowed scientists to precisely calculate that only 4.9 percent of the universe – which consists of energy and matter – is visible matter. As it is possible for energy to exist where there is no matter (for example, light carries energy and is able to travel through a vacuum, defined as space where there is no matter present).
It was possible to calculate also that 68.3 percent of the universe is dark energy while 26.8 percent is dark matter – something that logically has to exist, because there is not enough visible matter to cover exactly that amount of what we know must be matter.
Still, humanity has no means of accessing or seeing dark energy and matter.
In fact, we know more about what dark matter is not than what it actually is. We definitely know it’s dark: we cannot see it. It does not project or reflect light. For what we know, it is not of the same form as star phenomena that is observable.
We also know that dark matter is not ‘black clouds’ made of particles called baryons – we are able to detect these clouds thanks to the fact they can absorb radiation.
We are sure that dark matter is not antimatter because antimatter wipes out matter when in contact, a process which produces gamma rays; scientists working on that problem had not detected a considerable amount of gamma rays.
Finally, a phenomenon called gravitational lenses allowed scientists to rule out the possibility that dark matter is a huge black hole.
Up to this moment, a couple of theories arose to shine light on the mystery of dark matter. The most viable one assumes that dark matter consists of yet unknown particles.
There are also physicists who claim that dark matter could be explained by new theories about gravity and hence, theorise that gravity which acts on galaxies is different in nature from the gravity which acts on a planetary level.
For over twenty years, scientists have been trying to solve this intricacy and it does not seem like they are any closer to the answer. There is still a lot to discover in this ‘dark’ field. What we are now privileged to witness, is only the opening chapter of the next great discovery in the history of Physics.
Science Section Editor
Co-founder of Harbingers’ Magazine
Born in 2003, Aleksy is a Polish-French national studying in Warsaw, Poland. At Harbingers’ Magazine Aleksy writes about space exploration and edits the Science section.
Aleksy devotes his free time to building telescopes, drones and other space-related objects. He is a huge basketball fan and used to play at a competitive level, competing for trophies such as the Championship of Poland in the U-16 category in 2019.