October 17, 2024

Does Harry Potter have a passport?

author_bio
Ashley Solace in Nice, France

Article link copied.

slide image

JK Rowling has banned the publication of her books in Russia due to Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Picture by: Tim Sackton | Flickr

I was born in 2006, a year before the seventh and final Harry Potter book was published.

Although I was too young to remember it, I know it was a blast, as was the release of the two Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows movies based on it, in 2010 and 2011. The cinemas were packed with people.

As a gift on my tenth birthday, I got the whole Harry Potter series of books and a beautiful picture of Hogwarts, making me a HP fan for years. I even remember being jealous of my best friend, when her older sister brought her an actual Hedwig from the Harry Potter Museum in London.

My friends and I, we got the chance to read Stephen King and Neil Gaiman’s novels, cry at Tony Stark’s death in Avengers: Endgame, learn by heart Elsa’s song from Frozen, and see the first Inside Out on the big screen with popcorn and Coca-Cola. On weekends, we would watch the Disney channel on TV. If we wanted to switch, we would just press a button and turn on a Russian movie.

I had a great childhood.

I was raised on both international and Russian art. I was lucky to travel, to study in foreign schools, learn foreign languages, and pass Cambridge (English-language) and DELF (French-language) exams. My generation had a chance to explore different countries, read international books and watch American movies.

How young Ukrainians are coping after two and half years of war

Since 24 February 2022 – that day that Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine – more than 25 million Russian kids have lost that chance.

Best-selling authors including JK Rowling, Stephen King, Neil Gaiman, Jen Sincero and even Prince Harry, as well as many foreign publishers, have banned the publication of their books in Russia. Warner Brothers, Disney and Netflix have suspended services in the country.

Boycotting might seem like a good answer to the current Russian regime, but it doesn’t really prove a point and it also helps brainwash kids, giving an unlimited power to propaganda. If the goal is to lead Russia’s population towards democracy, then cutting ties to international culture is not what should be done.

It is well known that propaganda focuses on the easiest target: children, since they are flexible and suggestible. Influencing a grown-up, or even a teenager, requires a lot more work, due to the fact that they have a formed opinion on the world around them.

I recently saw a video of a group of second-graders dancing at a school show to a song about the war. No war in particular, just a man singing about saving his country. It may seem nice and patriotic, but it is hard to believe that an eight-year old kid can truly understand the meaning of murder or even the concept of war.

Moreover, if their opinion is going to be founded specifically on Russian books, films and music, what will they believe in the future?

History always repeats itself. In the Soviet Union, many songs, books and films were banned, specifically those that questioned the regime – for example, George Orwell’s Animal Farm and 1984.

That way the regime made the population, especially the youth, believe that their system was the best.

Nowadays, Russian kids see solely one opinion on political events. They are raised on books, school programmes and songs that falsify Russia’s history and distort reality. Erasing a big chunk of culture and education will not help; it is like Nazis burning books. And we all know what that led to.

Is this what the international community stands for?

A dictatorship washes out all the culture, it does not praise individuality. But it helps raise an army with no opinion other than what they have been told on the TV or at school.

Eventually, today’s children will become the masses that are cheering in 1984 for whatever war they are having. With Eurasia or Eastasia, it doesn’t matter. They know that their country is good, all the others – bad. They are loyal to the system since it is the only one they know.

Do the kids, who are not supposed to be charged for their parents’ or politicians’ actions, need to be found guilty and deprived of access to the things that can help them stand up and actually change the situation?

Isn’t it more logical to nudge Russia in a more democratic direction by giving its kids the chance to explore the world?

Written by:

author_bio

Ashley Solace

Contributor

Nice, France

Born 2006 in Saint-Petersburg, Russia, Ashley now studies in Nice, France. She is interested in history and geopolitics, and plans to study international law. Ashley joined the magazine having won the Harbinger Prize’s Culture Category Award in 2024.

In her free time, Ashley likes reading and dancing. She has also spent four years in Shanghai, China.

Ashley speaks French, English and Russian.

Due to security concerns, the author’s image has been omitted and the name and surname have been changed

culture

Create an account to continue reading

A free account will allow you to bookmark your favourite articles, you can also sign up for the Harbingers’ Weekly Brief newsletter.

Login/Register